| Program Descriptions |
|
|
|
| Written by Administrator |
| Tuesday, 12 August 2008 22:33 |
|
1. Garden Academy
Garden Academy is a private school located in Maplewood, New Jersey. Our program provides special education to individuals with autism ages 3-21 using the principles of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Garden Academy uses scientific, data-based, and accountable interventions to provide an individualized education to students with autism so that they may lead lives of the greatest possible independence. Ours is a full-day (6 hours), full-year program. The model requires a 1:1 staff to student ratio in order to achieve an effective educational program for each student. We are committed to ensuring that our students develop the skills necessary to realize their full potential and to become integral and functional members of their families and communities. We accomplish these goals through:
Garden Academy’s educational programs are individualized to address specific deficits in the areas of communication, socialization and adaptive behaviors. Emphasis is placed on language acquisition, social interaction, self-help skills, pre-academic and academic skills, play skills and on the decrease of maladaptive behaviors. All aspects of the program at Garden Academy are derived from the science of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Pedagogical technologies employed include, but are not limited to, discrete trials, incidental teaching, video and audio modeling, shaping, scripting and script fading procedures and peer modeling. Generalization procedures are implemented as part of the program to ensure maintenance of skills across people and environments. Garden Academy also recognizes the need for students to be in the least restrictive environment in which they can learn. When appropriate, we provide transitional support to our students throughout their educational careers. To meet the rising demand for qualified professionals in the field of autism education, Garden Academy also provides hands-on, clinical training. Notably, a trainer is assigned to each classroom and works with the teaching staff each day, providing ongoing training and supervision. Garden Academy’s staff develops new curricula to educate those with autism and conducts and publishes research on the efficacy of interventions. Garden Academy also promotes increased community awareness and understanding of autism, pervasive developmental disorders, and appropriate interventions through its events, website, marketing communications and public workshops.
2. Description of the Asperger’s College Program at the Douglass
3. Description of the Asperger’s College Program at the Douglass By: Jane Barbin, Ph.D., BCBA 1. JB: With the increased need for quality school programs serving students with autism spectrum disorders, can you describe the developments which led to creation of this school based Asperger Program, which I understand opened its doors in August, 2006? KA: The Asperger Program’s genesis rests with a group of innovative, regional parents who recognized a striking disparity between the needs of this population and the availability of effective, comprehensive educational programming. Across several months, this group organized their efforts to include investigation of other programs in the country, research into possible local schools to develop the program, and contacts with local professionals who would support the campaign. This group initially approached Ivymount School to develop the program. Ivymount reviewed the results of this group’s work and determined that students with Asperger’s Disorder represent a population in great need and one that Ivymount could serve well. 2.Was this program based on similar educational models in regards to philosophy and student population served? Likewise, are there unique features to the program that set it apart? While other programs do specialize in serving this population, to my knowledge, there was not a model program that we could mirror in the development of our Asperger Program. However, we have adopted educational practices that are commonly found in programs that target this population. These include a formalized social skills curriculum and a challenging academic curriculum. Features that are unique to our program include our emphasis on the development of a replicable, model program; data-based decision making; social skills programming integrated 3.Since the program is focused on meeting the educational, social and emotional needs of students with an Asperger’s diagnosis, can you describe the program’s mission, staffing, and a typical daily schedule for students? The needs of students with Asperger’s Disorder require that we provide a program that fosters each student’s ability to demonstrate optimal and independent participation in self-directed activities, social relationships, educational futures, and occupations. This is the mission of our program. Each of our two classrooms of 8 students is staffed with one head teacher and two assistant teachers. Additionally, we offer one day each of occupational therapy, speech 4.You mentioned that a social skills class is held daily for students in the program and that sounds like a truly unique component for this program. Can you elaborate on the content and delivery of this component? What is involved and who delivers the service? The content of the social skills class includes conversation skills, emotional regulation, self monitoring, group/team participation, problem solving, and other skills that we identify through observation of the students. One of the purposes of this class is to be responsive to the needs of the students. The social skills class typically involves a short lesson that we teach to the group and an activity that we create to make the lesson more salient. From there, the classroom team ensures that we integrate that social skill into the context of the school day. Any member of the educational team can be involved in the social skills class, including the psychologist, speech/language pathologist, occupational therapist, and/or head teacher. 5. I understand that the program seeks to use empirical research to develop educational and therapeutic practices. Can you describe how this will or has worked so far? Unfortunately, there exists a paucity of intervention studies that examine the effectiveness of educational and therapeutic practices for this population. For every aspect of our educational programming, we have first explored the scientific literature to determine if specific techniques or academic approaches have been researched. When research does exist, we always use the results of that research to guide our decision making. Once we implement a technique or approach with a student, we collect individual performance data to evaluate intervention effectiveness. When research study data do not exist, we create a plan to examine the effectiveness of that technique or approach to help guide our decision making. 6. It is nice to see research in practice, as the program seeks to also contribute to the limited research available at this point. How do you see the program measuring success for students enrolled in the program, given the complex needs often associated with an Asperger’s diagnosis? There are significant complexities in meeting the needs of students with Asperger’s Disorder. The program’s success is best measured by the progress demonstrated by the students we serve. We believe that it is essential to measure success at several levels. The first level at which we measure success is data that reflect whether a student has mastered a skill in the Ivymount school setting, which is highly structured and controlled. It is then critical to obtain data that reflect whether a student generalizes a skill to other settings (e.g. home, community). We plan to facilitate and measure generalization in two ways: within the context of the school day and by working with parents/caregivers. Within the program, we plan to create generalization opportunities by developing partnerships with other schools in order to introduce opportunities with other, typically developing peers. We also plan several field trips that will introduce a variety of mainstream contexts that enhance our academic curriculum while affording our students the opportunity to engage with other peers. We are currently finalizing the development of our home support program. Currently, our plan is to offer a variety of parent seminars and develop partnerships through which parents help us better support generalization and understand the performance of our students in their home settings. We believe that both parent and student report offer further evidence of whether or not skill mastery is perceived from the individual or caregiver perspective. We consider both self-report or caregiver report related to performance and satisfaction. Ultimately, the success of our program will be measured by the ability of our former students to demonstrate meaningful and independent participation in self-directed activities, social relationships, educational futures, and occupations. 7. Those are such practically relevant and meaningful outcomes you are seeking. Can you elaborate further on what is meant by participation in selfdirected activities, social relationships, educational futures and occupations? Are we talking about gainful employment, close interpersonal relationships, and the like? Will this be measured in a longitudinal fashion, with long term outcomes as the ultimate goal? By self-directed, we mean that each individual has the right to choose what becomes a part of his/her life. The right to choose is a complex issue because it is not enough to simply say to a person, “These are your choices.” It is critical that an individual be able to make an informed choice. In order to make an informed choice, an individual needs to be able to identify potential consequences (both short and long term) as well as how each option aligns with his/her personal values and beliefs. If a person has difficulty predicting possible consequences, then he/she should learn the important questions to ask. By self-directed activities, we mean that we want each graduate of our program to be able to select the activities that occupy his/her day, including leisure skills, group affiliations, and daily routines. By self-determined relationships, we want each graduate of our program to be able to include the types of relationships and the people he/ she desires in his/her life, including romantic relationships, friendships of different levels (e.g. acquaintance, close friend), and work relationships. By self-determined educational futures, we intend for each graduate of our program to be able to pursue an educational program at a college or university and to also select an educational degree. Finally, we desire for each of our graduates to participate in a career that he/she finds rewarding and in which he/she finds success and the means to support living in the community. These are long term objectives that we intend to measure through follow-up with our graduates. In summary, a success for our program would 8. Though the program is quite new and this may be a bit premature, do you have ideas or plans for where you would like to see the program grow in the future? We plan to continue developing a program that can be responsive to the needs of our community. We continue to evaluate the demographic information of those who investigate our program as a possible placement. We further plan to develop the program in a way that avoids compromising the integrity of our educational programming. We also plan to contribute to the research base by reporting on the efficacy of our educational and therapeutic practices. Eventually, we plan to have a model program that can be replicated and shared with others seeking to serve this population of students. 9. Katie, it sounds like your focus on evidence-based practice and meeting the needs of individuals with Asperger’s Disorder is at the crux of the program’s mission. I am sure that as a group we can agree that establishing and maintaining program integrity is a difficulty yet worthwhile endeavor. Best of luck as your program develops and evolves. Thank you for sharing information on the Ivymount School Asperger Program with the Autism SIG. At some point in the future, we would like to hear how your program is developing and the kind of outcome data you are obtaining. 3. Description of the Home-based Program at The New England Center for Children (NECC) By: Bill Holcomb The New England Center for Children (NECC) is a private autism center dedicated to bringing out human potential and creating productive lives. Located 20 miles west of Boston in Southborough, Massachusetts, NECC currently serves more than 200 students with autism and other related disabilities, from 6 states and 2 foreign countries. Since 1975 NECC has provided state-of-the-art education and individualized Intensive Home-based Program Curriculum and Approach Placement Factors
4. Behavioral Directions By Jane Barbin, Ph.D. General Information Behavioral Directions is a private consulting firm providing services to individuals with autism spectrum disorders and related developmental disabilities. Family services are provided through parent training, advocacy, support groups, and set-up /monitoring of home-based ABA programs. Behavioral Directions was founded by Jane Barbin, Ph.D., the founding director of the Ivymount Autism Program in Rockville, Maryland, a centerbased education and treatment program serving children and adolescents with autism utilizing behavioral intervention. Given the vast array of available treatments to address autism spectrum disorders (few of which are based in science), Behavioral Directions was created to promote utilization of strategies with known scientific effectiveness to promote appropriate educational programming, address symptoms of autism (i.e., social and communication deficits) and reduced challenging behaviors that often accompany these disorders. Applied behavior analysis (ABA) methodology is employed for increase and decrease of selected behaviors. Behavioral observations and treatment in natural settings (e.g., home, school, and community) are used to enhance effectiveness. Collaboration with related professionals is also conducted as needed. Selection and monitoring of educational and skill acquisition programming is offered in school and home settings, functional assessment/analysis is used to identify functions of difficult behaviors and to provide for function-based treatments. Parent and staff training on designed plans and data-based monitoring and Advocacy Family Support Home-Based Behavioral Programming Clinical Training and Experience 5. The New Jersey Center for Outreach and Services for the Autism Community (COSAC) By: Suzanne Buchanan, Psy.D., BCBA COSAC is a non-profit agency that provides information, education, and advocacy for parents and professionals. The New Jersey State Division of Developmental Disabilities, individual and agency memberships, and private and corporate donations fund the agency, enabling COSAC to provide free services to parents. Information Support Groups Sibling Pen Pal Program The Parent Series on Behavioral Teaching Home-based Consultation Workshops In summary, COSAC provides a variety of family services designed to empower parents and improve services for individuals with autism. COSAC holds a unique place in New Jersey’s autism community as a clearinghouse of accurate information and indirect support services so often needed by families. For further information, please contact us. 6. Autism & Aspergers Consulting and Treatment Now (AACT Now) An Integrated Solutions Approach Autism & Aspergers Consulting and Treatment Now (AACT Now) specializes in designing in-home therapy programs and providing continued consultation services for special needs children. We began working with children diagnosed with Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, and Asperger’s and have expanded our services to include those with Downs Syndrome, cerebral palsy and other developmental disorders. While the core of our programming is derived from the research of Dr. Ivar Lovaas and Verbal Behavior theories, we recognize that each child is an individual. Because we believe each child faces unique challenges, we have augmented our approach with the most current techniques from a variety of disciplines that work with developmental disorders to provide a truly integrated and personalized resource for our clients. Mr. James Deehr began working with children with Autism in July, 1995, through the Wisconsin Lovaas study replication site. He completed an intensive training based on the UCLA program established by Dr. Ivar O. Lovaas, under the direction of WEAP (Wisconsin Early Autism Project). In his nine years of involvement with children with autism, Mr. Deehr has worked with more than 250 children diagnosed with AACT Now currently offers services for families in Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Texas, Wisconsin and Mexico with more states to come. Quality and affordability are important to our mission. Many of our service areas have local consultants which allow us to keep travel expenses to a minimum, but all families are supervised by a senior staff member. Many families’ only contact with an organization is their consultant. This is not the case with AACT Now, as children receive supervision from a variety of sources within our organization. AACT Now offers programs in sign-language, English, and Spanish. Please visit our website www.aactnow.com or contact us for more information. For Texas/New Mexico and Mexico call 1-915-587-0929 7. Nassau Suffolk Services for Autism Overview Program Characteristics 1. A 1 to 1.5 teacher to student ratio. The learning challenges presented by learners with autism are complex and diverse. With the high teacher to student ratio, the educational program at the Martin C. Barell School is able to provide a high level of student engagement, an increased number of learning opportunities, a highly individualized curriculum, and comprehensive behavioral supports. 2. The program enrolls a maximum of 25 children. The small size is considered integral to achieving optimal results for each learner by promoting a significant degree of individualization and educational a clinical oversight. 3. The highly structure, skill oriented instructional program is based upon the research validated science of applied behavior analysis (ABA). Interventions that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific validation are not used. 4. Individual learner goals are data-based and operationally defined. Data-based program permit objective evaluations of individual progress and provide the opportunity to modify instructional programs as necessary to enhance learning. In order to best accomplish this, individual learners may be provided with a student specific “decision tree” for the assessment of individual progress. A sample decision tree for one student is attached. 5. Ongoing assessment of each learner’s reinforcement preferences leads to the development of highly individualized motivational 6. NSSA provides related services in the form of speech and language \services from ABA trained, Masters level speech and language pathologists. Based upon individual needs, learners may receive individual, one on one speech sessions or may be provided with a more consultative model of speech to address social and pragmatic concerns. 7. Activity schedules are used to promote learner independence. Each learner moves within different levels of an activity schedule and is involved with as many as 3-5 teachers a day. This is designed to promote skill generalization on the part of the learner while also ensuring that a majority of classroom personnel are familiar with an individual’s educational and behavioral programmatics. 8. A home programming component provides parents with extensive in-school and at-home training in how to utilize ABA at home to better support the transfer of skill gains to home and to more effectively address family specific instructional or behavioral challenges. Families of younger children receive far more direct instruction than do families of older children who may chose to use their home programming hours solely on an “as needed” basis to address specific challenges (e.g. sleep disorders, aggression at home, etc.) In addition, family support needs are addressed through NSSA sponsored parent and sibling support groups, an open door visitation policy, and a twice weekly after school program. 9. Utilizing the behavioral maxim, “Teach where the behavior is most likely to be displayed,” NSSA provides the opportunity for extensive community-based instruction for our students In addition, as individuals reach the age of 16 years they are provided with a comprehensive transition program that includes community based job sampling. 10. As individuals with autism may engage in problematic or challenging behavior, NSSA maintains active Peer Review and Human Rights Committees. Consisting of the NSSA clinical staff along with up to four, non-affiliated professionals with expertise in autism and ABA, the Peer Review Committee reviews programs for clinical competence in terms of behavioral assessment and its relationship to the proposed intervention and current, published research. The Human Rights Committee, chaired by a NSSA parent, ensures the proposed behavior intervention programs do not violate individual human rights. 11. Staff receive ongoing training and regular supervisory evaluation. Our evaluation tools are designed to identify both areas of strength and areas in need of attention.
Admissions Future Services Adult Employment Services: As our students move toward ageing out of the Barell School, NSSA is working with NY State OMRDD to provide post-21 adult day and employment services. It is anticipated that such services will be in place by September, 2003. Residential Services: Given the lack of appropriate and accessible residential options for adolescent and adults with autism on Long Island, NSSA is actively pursuing the development of group homes and similar residential supports and services. It is anticipated that such services will be in place by September 2005. Reaching Potentials, Inc. is a private nonprofit organization serving children with autism and their families. We partner with parents and the professional community to provide research-based services. Since our inception in 1995, Reaching Potentials has proudly promoted lifelong access and opportunity for all individuals within the autism spectrum and their families, so that they may be fully participating, included members of their community.
Recognizing and respecting the diverse range of opinions, needs and desires of this group, Reaching Potentials empowers individuals with autism, their parents and caregivers by utilizing the principals of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). At the very core of this philosophy is the understanding that while no single program or treatment will benefit all individuals with autism, ABA is an empirically proven method of intervention that supports our commitment to evidence-based practice which addresses the unique needs of each child and his/her family.
With treatment centers located in Boca Raton, Florida and Fredericksburg, Virginia, we now serve an increasing population of individuals and families affected by autism. Our primary services include: Day Program - An early intervention center based day treatment program, providing one-on-one individualized instruction for children age 14 months to 6 years. (Older children are considered on a case-by-case basis.) Utilizing programming based on the principals of Applied Behavior Analysis, instruction targets a variety of areas including communication, academics, adaptive/daily living skills, play skills and social interaction; Tutoring - In addition to our center based day program, we offer after school tutoring and support for elementary and middle school age children. This program is appropriate for children who need extra help with academics, homework and/or social skills; Home Based Programs – For families who decide to implement programs at home, we offer program development, support and supervision for home based ABA programs; Training – A core piece of our efforts has always included parent and professional training classes. Beginning, intermediate and advanced training topics in Applied Behavior Analysis and Autism Intervention are offered for family members and professionals involved in the education, care, treatment, and support of individuals with autism spectrum disorders; Internships – Reaching Potentials has long recognized the need to increase the availability of trained personnel to support individuals with autism spectrum disorders. To help provide support in this area, we provide student internships and supervision of fieldwork for professionals pursuing certification; Outreach Services – For families outside of our local geographic area, we offer distance supervision for home based programs (achieved through travel to the home supplemented with phone, email and video observation.) Consultation Services - Behavior analytic consultation services are available to assist with a variety of other needs such as Functional Behavior Assessments, School Based Observation and Consultation Services, IEP Consultation, Skills Assessment, Supported Inclusion; Community Education and Autism Awareness – Promoting awareness and support in the community is achieved through community presentations and workshops, special events and collaborative campaigns. FLORIDA OFFICE: 500 NE Spanish River Blvd., Suites 11 & 12, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone: 561-391-1004 Fax: 561-391-1008 VIRGINIA OFFICE: 1602 William St., Upper Floor, Fredericksburg, VA 22401 Phone: 540-368-8087 Fax: 540-368-8059 WEBSITE: 8. Opportunities Taken: The Center for Autism and Applied Behavior Analysis at Caldwell CollegeKenneth F. Reeve, Ph.D., BCBA-D In late 2010, Caldwell College was proud to announce the opening of its new Center for Autism and Applied Behavior Analysis at Caldwell College. Walk into the space and you are immediately struck by the opportunities it provides. “Our goal is to graduate professionals to educate people with autism and to conduct cutting-edge research on science-based intervention strategies,” said Sharon A. Reeve, Ph.D., BCBA-D, Executive Director of the Center, and Chair of the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) department. “It is also a place where families will find hope for themselves and their children with autism.” Opening the Center was a natural step for the college, which has become a leader in training behavior analysts and autism education professionals, since beginning New Jersey’s first Master of Art’s in ABA program in 2005 and the state’s first Ph.D. program in 2009. Along with ABA faculty members Dr. Tina Sidener, BCBA-D, and Dr. Ruth DeBar, BCBA-D, Reeve traveled the country and studied the most respected autism intervention centers prior to designing the 6,000 square-foot state-of-the-art facility at Caldwell College. The Center features intervention rooms, a medical/dental examination room, research space, faculty and graduate student offices, and a modern videoconferencing classroom that allows Caldwell to share its research and expertise around the globe. “In a way, we combined all of the best aspects of the top-notch centers into the Caldwell College Center for Autism and ABA,” said Sidener, Director of Training at the Center. Under the guidance of the faculty, Master and doctoral students work hands-on with learners ranging in age from infancy to adulthood, and teach them basic and advanced social, communication, academic, and adaptive skills, through the principles of ABA. When individuals come to the Center for services, they are assessed by an ABA faculty member. Then, a plan of intervention tailored to the specific needs of each individual is developed in collaboration between faculty and graduate students. The Center staff also provides home and school consultation, developmental assessments, and support services. Elena Garcia-Albea, a doctoral student who has been teaching children with disabilities in both private and public schools, is eager for the chance to collaborate with the Caldwell professors. “Their mentorship and guidance will help me become a better behavior analyst.” In collaboration with the Caldwell College graduate programs in ABA, the Center helps to meet the shortage of qualified professionals to teach children with autism and to design effective programs for them. In addition to serving as a training space for master’s and doctoral students, the Center also serves as a hub for research. “What helps our work at the Center advance the fields of ABA and autism intervention is that able to uncover better teaching procedures through empirical studies, apply those procedures to our learners, and then disseminate them to professional colleagues through peer-reviewed research journals,” Reeve explained. State-of-the-art videoconferencing equipment in the Center will allow the professionals to communicate remotely with families affected by autism and reach out to colleagues across the country and around the world to share research. ABA faculty members have even been approached by professionals in Europe who are interested in offering degree programs through the use of videoconferencing. “We are one of only a handful of doctoral programs in ABA in the U.S., and many other countries have even fewer programs,” said DeBar, Director of Outreach at the Center. “Educators in these countries are looking for ways to gain access to the training provided by quality ABA programs, and we have the equipment to connect with them.”
Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE The Neurobehavioral Unit at Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore, MDThe Neurobehavioral Unit (NBU) is a 16-bed inpatient unit dedicated to the assessment and treatment of severe problem behavior displayed by individuals with autism and intellectual disabilities (ID). This is a unique program that specializes in the treatment of severe and highly treatment resistant problems, provides intensive behavioral assessment and treatment services, offers integrated and targeted application of behavioral and pharmacological interventions (Hagopian & Caruso-Anderson, 2010). In addition to providing specialized treatment services, the NBU offers advanced training in applied behavior analysis through its APA-approved predoctoral internship and postdoctoral fellowship. The program has been in existence since the early 1980's, and has served patients from 31 states and several countries. Individuals aged 2-19 years admitted to the NBU present with a variety of severe and sometimes life-threatening behavioral problems, as well as complex medical issues. Criteria for admission are that behavior is of such severity and/or intensity that the individual is a danger to him or herself and is at risk for long-term residential placement. Admission length typically varies from three to six months. Treatment Approach Individuals admitted to the NBU inpatient service receive behavioral, psychiatric, educational, developmental, and social assessments and interventions. Behavioral assessment and treatment strategies are derived from an applied behavior analysis model. Interventions are developed based on the results of systematic behavioral assessments, including functional behavioral assessments (e.g., functional analysis), analysis of parent-child interactions, and reinforcer assessments. The interventions are individually designed to decrease problem behavior, while increasing more appropriate and adaptive responses. Furthermore, concomitant psychiatric disorders (e.g., mood disorders, ADHD) are also systematically evaluated and treated. Treatment effectiveness is systematically evaluated using reliable objective measures (i.e., direct observation) and single-case designs. Behavioral and psychiatric interventions are developed and applied in an integrated manner to achieve the goal of formulating the safest, least restrictive and most effective treatment regimen for each patient. Outcome data indicate that the primary treatment goal of reducing problem behavior by at least 80 percent is achieved for more than 80 percent of patients. A critical component of the program is to train caregivers (e.g., parents and teachers) to implement prescribed behavioral treatments. When possible, pre-admission home and school visits are conducted to assess both child and caregiver behavior. These assessments continue while the child is an inpatient. Once an effective treatment has been developed during the hospitalization, caregivers are trained to implement the intervention at mastery level (90 percent accuracy). Caregivers practice implementation of the treatment in a variety of naturalistic settings under the supervision of a behavior therapist to promote maintenance of treatment gains. Intensive outpatient services are initiated at the time of discharge by the NBU outpatient department to help ensure a smooth transition from the hospital to the client's home. Thereafter, the intensity of outpatient services varies depending on the needs of the patient and family. Solutions for Individuals with Autism and Related Conditions The NBU has a long history of developing new and innovative procedures for the assessment and treatment of severe behavior disorders. In fact, NBU faculty have published numerous articles (including some seminal papers) related to behavioral assessments, communication training, behavior analysis, reinforcer identification, treatment development, pharmacological interventions, and behavioral medicine. For NBU patients with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), treatments have focused on addressing issues such as increasing tolerance to change, improving communication and social skills, and decreasing repetitive, stereotypic behavior. Below is a summary of intervention approaches as they relate to each of these diagnostic concerns. Learning to Tolerate Change. Individuals with ASD often have difficulties tolerating change, interruption, or being denied access to preferred activities. While it is reasonable and appropriate to engineer the environment to minimize change and interruption, excessive accommodations can be detrimental and not sustainable in the long run. For a sizable minority of individuals with ASD and problem behavior, being interrupted from engaging in stereotypic behavior or interrupted from engaging in an activity when being transitioned to the next activity may be highly aversive because it involves both a loss of reinforcement and is unpredictable (Flannery & Horner, 1994; McCord, Thomson, & Iwata, 2001). When children react to this situation with frustration and the display of severe problem behavior, adults may terminate their attempts to transition the child, or generally avoid interruptions. Over the course of repeated exposure to this situation, these behavior patterns are strengthened and these children come to respond to most adult interactions and prompts with great agitation. Research has shown how problem behavior can be occasioned when individuals with ASD are interrupted, and how this maladaptive pattern can be changed through the use of signaling procedures, redirection, and gradually increasing tolerance to interruption by pairing compliance with interruptions with alternative reinforcement (Adelinis & Hagopian, 1999; Fisher, Adelinis, Thompson, Worsdell, & Zarcone, 1998; Hagopian & Adelinis, 2001; Hagopian, Bruzek, Bowman, & Jennett, 2007). This research illustrates how targeting a core deficit of autism, namely insistence on sameness and rigid stereotyped patterns of behavior is possible and can be critical in addressing problem behavior.
Increasing Communication Skills. Deficits in expressive and receptive communication may place individuals with ASD at increased risk for problem behavior because their needs cannot be effectively communicated. There is an abundance of research demonstrating that problem behavior (self-injury, aggression, etc) that sometimes co-occurs with ASD is often maintained by social consequences such as adult attention, access to toys, or escape from tasks (identified via functional behavioral assessment). Functional Communication Training (FCT) is an intervention for problem behavior that involves teaching the individual an appropriate communication response as a means of accessing reinforcement in lieu of problem behavior. Research on FCT has demonstrated its efficacy for the treatment of severe behavior displayed by children with ASD and ID, and has examined the mechanisms by which it may exert its effects (Fisher, Thompson, Bowman, Hagopian, & Krug, 2000; Hagopian, Fisher, Sullivan, Acquisto, & LeBlanc, 1998; Hagopian, Wilson, & Wilder, 2001; Hagopian, Kuhn, Long, & Rush, 2005; Tiger, Hanley, & Bruzek, 2008). Once problem behaviors are reduced and a functional communication response is taught, it is important to teach individuals to discriminate times when requests can and cannot be honored, such as when adults are busy (Kuhn, Chigrin, & Zelenka, 2010). An additional goal is to increase individuals’ tolerance to being denied immediate access to preferred activities and other reinforcers (an unavoidable event for everyone) as a means of enhancing the long-term sustainability of FCT interventions and ensuring the resilience of newly acquired communication responses (e.g., Hagopian et al., 2005).
Social Skills Training. For individuals with ASD, social skills deficits may impair day-to-day social interactions, and also result in missed opportunities to learn since much of learning occurs incidentally though social interactions and observation of others. Research has shown that individuals with ASD can be taught how to appropriately request social interaction, how to interact with others more appropriately (Hagopian, Kuhn, & Strother, 2009; Krantz & McClannahan, 1998; LeBlanc, Coates, Daneshvar, Charlop-Christy, Morris, & Lancaster, 2003), and to appropriately request that social interaction be terminated when it is unwanted (Hagopian, Wilson, & Wilder, 2001). As is the case with training communication skills, establishing effective social interaction skills can be helpful in both reducing problem behavior as well as broadening adaptive skills that can improve the individual’s quality of life.
Addressing Repetitive or Stereotyped Behavior. Repetitive or stereotyped behavior can pose problems in children with ASD, because the behavior can result in injury, can be highly disruptive, or it interferes with the establishment of appropriate behavior. A variation of the preference assessment, the competing stimulus assessment, is designed to identify items that produce stimulation that is more reinforcing than stimulation produced by self-stimulatory and some types of self-injurious behavior (Fisher, DeLeon, Rodriquez-Catter, & Keeney, 2004; Hagopian, Rush, Lewin, & Long, 2001; Hagopian, Kuhn, Long, & Rush, 2005; Jennett, Jann, & Hagopian, in press; Piazza, Fisher, Hanley, Hilker, & Derby, 1996; Piazza, Adelinis, Hanley, Goh, & Delia, 2000; Shore, Iwata, DeLeon, Kahng, & Smith, 1997). These procedures go beyond simply identifying reinforcement maintaining problem behavior and seek to identify reinforcers that compete with or are superior to those maintaining reinforcers. Problems with excessive stereotypic/self-stimulatory behavior and leisure skills deficits have been addressed by targeting toy play skills directly (Kuhn, Hagopian, & Kuhn, 2007). This approach involves using supplemental reinforcers to establish appropriate toy contact and toy engagement. Once the individual contacts the reinforcing properties of toy engagement itself, the supplemental reinforcers are removed.
References Adelinis, J.D. & Hagopian, L.P. (1999). The use of symmetrical ‘do’ and ‘don’t’ requests to interrupt ongoing activities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 519-523. Fisher, W.W., Adelinis, J.D., Thompson, R.H., Worsdell, A.S., & Zarcone, J.R. (1998). Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of ‘don’t’ (and symmetrical ‘do’) requests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(3), 339-356. Fisher, W.W., DeLeon, I.G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Keeney, K.M. (2004). Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(2), 171-184. Fisher, W.W., Thompson, R.H., Hagopian, L.P., Bowman, L.G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 3-29. Flannery, B.K. & Horner, R.H. (1994). The relationship between predictability and problem behavior for students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4(2), 157-176. Hagopian, L.P. & Adelinis, J.D. (2001). Response blocking with and without redirection for the treatment of pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(4), 527-530. Hagopian, L.P., Bruzek, J.L., Bowman, L.G., & Jennett, H.K. (2007). Assessment and treatment of problem behavior occasioned by interruption of free-operant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 89-103. Hagopian, L.P. & Caruso-Anderson, M.E. (2010). Integrating behavioral and pharmacological interventions for severe problem behavior displayed by children with neurogenetic and developmental disorders. In B.K. Shapiro & J. Pasquale (Eds.), Neurogenetic syndromes: Behavioral issues and their treatment (pp. 217-239). Baltimore, MD US: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. Hagopian, L.P., Fisher, W.W., Sullivan, M., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L.A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: A summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(2), 211-235. Hagopian, L.P., Kuhn, S.A.C., Long, E.S., & Rush, K.S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: Using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforce density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(2), 177-193. Hagopian, L.P., Kuhn, D.E., & Strother, G.E. (2009). Targeting social skills deficits in an adolescent with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 907-911. Hagopian, L.P., Rush, K.S., Lewin, A.B., & Long, E.S. (2001). Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(4), 475-485. Hagopian, L.P., Wilson, D.M., & Wilder, D.A. (2001). Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(2), 229-232. Jennett, H.K., Jann, K., & Hagopian, L.P. (in press). A further refinement of competing stimulus assessments: Inclusion of response blocking and representation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Krantz, P.J. & McClannahan, L.E. (1998). Social interaction skills for children with autism: A script-fading procedure for beginning readers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(2), 191-202. Kuhn, D.E., Chirighin, A.E., & Zelenka, K. (2010). Discriminated functional communication: A procedural extension of functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(2), 249-264. Kuhn, D.E., Hagopian, L.P., & Kuhn, S.A.C. (2007). The effects of increasing appropriate play skills on preference for toys. In J.E. Ringdahl (Chair) Symposium presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. San Diego, CA. LeBlanc, L.A., Coates, A.M., Daneshvar, S., Charlop-Christy, M.H., Morris, C., & Lancaster, B.M. (2003). Using video modeling and reinforcement to teach perspective-taking skills to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 253-257. McCord, B.E., Thomson, R.J., & Iwata, B.A. (2001). Functional analysis and treatment of self-injury associated with transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(2), 195-210. Piazza, C.C., Adelinis, J.D., Hanley, G.P., Goh, H., & Delia, M.D. (2000). An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(1), 13-27. Piazza, C.C., Fisher, W.W., Hanley, G.P., Hilker, K., & Derby, K.M. (1996). A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcer-based procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(2), 137-152. Shore, B.A., Iwata, B.A., DeLeon, I.G., Kahng, S., & Smith, R.G. (1997). An analysis of reinforce substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 21-40. Tiger, J.H., Hanley, G.P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 16-23.
|
| Last Updated on Monday, 04 June 2012 19:12 |


